Among the engineering analyses required for electrical system safety, arc flash analysis has the most direct connection to protecting human life. An arcing fault — where electrical current flows through an unintended plasma arc between conductors or from energized conductors to ground can release tremendous thermal energy in milliseconds, causing burns, injuries, and fatalities to workers in the vicinity of the equipment.
OSHA’s electrical safety standards (29 CFR 1910.269 for power generation and distribution, 1910.333 for general industry) and NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace require arc flash hazard analysis and labeling for electrical equipment. This guide explains the engineering methodology, regulatory requirements, and practical applications of arc flash analysis.
What Is Arc Flash?
An arc flash occurs when an electric current passes through air between conductors or between a conductor and ground. The arc produces:
- Intense radiant heat: Arc temperatures can exceed 35,000°F (approximately 19,400°C) four times the surface temperature of the sun capable of igniting clothing and causing severe burns at significant distances
- Pressure wave: Rapid expansion of vaporized metal and ionized gas creates a blast overpressure that can throw workers and shatter equipment
- Molten metal spray: Copper and other conductors are vaporized and expelled as superheated droplets
- Acoustic energy: The pressure wave produces sound levels that can cause hearing damage even at protective distances
The incident energy (IE) the thermal energy per unit area delivered to a worker at a specific distance from the arc source is the key safety metric computed by arc flash analysis. IE is measured in cal/cm² (calories per square centimeter).
IEEE 1584-2018: The Arc Flash Calculation Standard
IEEE 1584-2018, the Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations, is the standard methodology for computing incident energy in low-voltage and medium-voltage electrical equipment. The 2018 revision represents a major update from the 2002 version, incorporating an expanded empirical dataset from hundreds of arc flash tests at the Canadian National Institute for Scientific and Technical Research (IREQ) and others.
Key improvements in IEEE 1584-2018 include:
Three-Phase AC Arc Current Model: A new, more physically accurate model for computing arcing current as a function of system available fault current, bus gap, conductor configuration, and enclosure type.
Enclosure Type Factor: The 2018 standard explicitly accounts for whether the arc occurs in open air, in a box enclosure, or in cable trays — each configuration produces different incident energy levels.
Asymmetry Factor: The 2018 model accounts for the asymmetry of the initial arc current waveform, which affects incident energy during the first few cycles.
Electrode Configuration Variability: New model coefficients reflect tested electrode configurations (VCB – vertical conductors in a box, VCBB – vertical conductors in a box with a barrier, HCB – horizontal conductors in a box, HOA – horizontal conductors in open air, VOA – vertical conductors in open air).
Arc Flash Calculation Methodology
The IEEE 1584-2018 calculation process involves:
Step 1: System Data Collection
- Available fault current at each equipment location
- Protective device operating times (from coordination study)
- Equipment voltage level, bus gap, and enclosure type
- Working distance for each equipment location
Step 2: Arcing Current Calculation The arcing current (Iarc) is computed from the available bolted fault current (Ibf), gap between conductors, and equipment voltage using IEEE 1584-2018 equations. Both 100% arcing current (for determining protection clearing time) and 85% arcing current (for determining maximum incident energy) must be computed.
Step 3: Incident Energy Calculation The incident energy is computed as a function of arcing current, protective device clearing time, working distance, enclosure type, and electrode configuration.
Step 4: Protection Boundary Calculation The arc flash protection boundary (AFB) is the distance at which incident energy equals 1.2 cal/cm² — the onset of second-degree burn to unprotected skin.
Step 5: PPE Selection Based on computed incident energy, appropriate arc-rated personal protective equipment is specified from the NFPA 70E arc rating categories:
- Category 1: ≥4 cal/cm² arc rating
- Category 2: ≥8 cal/cm² arc rating
- Category 3: ≥25 cal/cm² arc rating
- Category 4: ≥40 cal/cm² arc rating
Strategies for Reducing Arc Flash Hazard
One of the most valuable outputs of arc flash analysis is identifying opportunities to reduce incident energy levels through engineering controls, which allow lower-rated PPE to be used:
Reduce Protective Device Clearing Time: Faster clearing time directly reduces incident energy. Protection coordination modifications to speed up clearing at specific equipment locations can dramatically reduce hazard levels.
Current Limiting Fuses: Current limiting fuses interrupt fault current in less than half a cycle, drastically reducing incident energy in circuits they protect.
Zone-Selective Interlocking (ZSI): Low-voltage switchgear with ZSI can accelerate clearing for close-in faults while maintaining coordination selectivity for remote faults.
Bus Differential Protection: High-speed bus differential protection clears bus faults in 1-3 cycles, limiting incident energy at the bus location.
Arc Flash Detection Relays: Light-sensing arc flash detection relays respond to the light emitted by an arcing fault, clearing it in under 1 cycle dramatically reducing incident energy for equipment faults.
Our power system studies team performs complete IEEE 1584-2018 arc flash studies and identifies arc flash reduction opportunities for substation and industrial power systems.
CTA: Arc Flash Study Services | Power System Studies | Substation Design